Page 2 of 2

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 4:49 pm
by rb6banjo
The more you dilute the sample, the less you will be able to see acetaldehyde. We use static headspace for AA and DMS in beer. If you want it using SPME you might try the carboxen/pdms (black) fiber. I find it to be a little better for really light materials.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:06 pm
by xeim
The more you dilute the sample, the less you will be able to see acetaldehyde. We use static headspace for AA and DMS in beer. If you want it using SPME you might try the carboxen/pdms (black) fiber. I find it to be a little better for really light materials.
Is it possible to not dilute the beer samples at all? I don't have car/pdms.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 5:55 pm
by rb6banjo
I never dilute the beer if it's somewhere close to 5% (v/v) EtOH.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Wed Aug 14, 2013 7:59 pm
by MSCHemist
Keep in mind acetaldehyde is a small 2 carbon molecule. It won't bind to the fiber as tightly as larger compounds and the ethanol is going to crowd out a lot of analytes. Also it's small size gives it a low repsonse to begin with so your LOD is going to be pretty high for acetaldehyde.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:26 am
by xeim
I never dilute the beer if it's somewhere close to 5% (v/v) EtOH.
Thanks for the post. It's better to adjust the EtOH concentrations in the samples until 5% v/v? I'm afraid that excessive dilution won't allow FID detecting the aroma compounds.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:30 am
by xeim
Keep in mind acetaldehyde is a small 2 carbon molecule. It won't bind to the fiber as tightly as larger compounds and the ethanol is going to crowd out a lot of analytes. Also it's small size gives it a low repsonse to begin with so your LOD is going to be pretty high for acetaldehyde.
Thank you. What is the approximate LOD for AA using the SPME?

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 1:35 pm
by MSCHemist
We still did pretty good though we were a bit overgenerous with the LOQ. Our level 1 was 20 ppb.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2013 6:53 pm
by xeim
We still did pretty good though we were a bit overgenerous with the LOQ. Our level 1 was 20 ppb.
You did that with SPME and FID?

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2013 12:22 pm
by MSCHemist
No MSD-scan Though we probably could have done better on some compounds using the SIM/SCAN and using the SIM mode on the more trace compounds.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 9:24 am
by xeim
Could you tell me please how many times i need to dilute the sample consisting 40%v/v EtOH in order to avoid fiber swelling?

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2013 6:05 pm
by MSCHemist
Could you tell me please how many times i need to dilute the sample consisting 40%v/v EtOH in order to avoid fiber swelling?
You're going to have to experimentally determine that. run a dilution series until you get the optimal combination of less SPME swelling and detectablilty of your analytes.

Re: HELP!!! SPME

Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:51 am
by BZK
Hi Xeim, measuring of low boiling aroma compounds with only FID is a problematic task.
I do this with MSD because into the range of acetaldehyde elution could be present methanol or some light hydrocarbons. First of all you need, as recommended from other colleague, to decrease the inlet diameter to the minimun possible. In my case I using a self made on-column arrangement and inject the fiber directly into 0.53 mm id precolumn. In this way without splitting or cryotrapping it's possible to see also permanent gases such as oxigen, argon or nitrogen. With DB-5ms, 60m, the elution order is permanent gases togheter followed from propane, isobutane, butane, SO2, acetaldehyde, methanol and so on. But without MSD and with optimized injection system you need anyway a very polar and long column to discriminate from non polar compounds very often present on acetaldehyde range and also to increase separation between acetadehyde and methanol.
I hope to be helpful to you.

Robertino