Chromatography Forum is a public discussion group where you can post questions, news, or messages of interest to chromatographers everywhere, but you must be registered to participate (registration is FREE). If you are a registered user, please log in.
http://www.chromforum.org/
Somewhere in the data software there will be a function that will give you a number for signal:noise - run that. And please don't use text message abbreviations when you post on here.Ya M serious. Coz m new to this. I've performed AMV for one of our product. As I am doing right the first time, m confuse which value should be considered for H and h.You are not serious - are you?
Pls. help me.
Thanks.
Thanks PeterSomewhere in the data software there will be a function that will give you a number for signal:noise - run that. And please don't use text message abbreviations when you post on here.Ya M serious. Coz m new to this. I've performed AMV for one of our product. As I am doing right the first time, m confuse which value should be considered for H and h.You are not serious - are you?
Pls. help me.
Thanks.
Peter
Thank You Very muchh is from the bottom of the noise to the top of the noise (i.e. define a region that you consider to be background, draw a line that just touches the bottoms of the noise spikes, and another that just touches the tops, and measure the distance between them). H is the height of the peak, theoretically measured from the middle of the base-line to the middle of the noise at the top of the peak, but as danko has pointed out, because of software constraints, it's usually measured somewhere else. Frankly it doesn't matter, because S/N is just not a good way to determine LOD/LOQ. It's better used as an ongoing measure of performance, in which case it doesn't matter how you define it, provided you always calculate it the same way.
