-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:04 pm
Advertisement
Poor Consistency on Agilent 5975 GC-MS
Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.
18 posts
Page 2 of 2
No I've never used xylene/toluene to clean the instrument. It's prevalent in the large peak eluting around 21.8 minutes...
-
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:26 pm
If you have not been able to eliminate Xylene by now, I would clean/ replace the carrier line. How old is your split trap? Depending on the usage, you should change this trap every year.
-
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 5:47 pm
I would agree with 01310040231. I would also replace the copper line leading to the trap or remove it and clean it. I usually use MeOH, Acetone then Hexane and then Acetone again. After this then heat it gently to remove residual solvent. This has worked for me to remove almost "tar-like" contamination in the split-vent line and the system comes back to normal operating conditions. I'm fairly certain this is where your problem is.
I have a hard time believing that the peak is actually xylene/toluene as they would typically elute within the first 5 min on a 30m column. It is probably a high MW contaminant stuck in the split-vent with a phenyl group on it somewhere to be fragmented giving the 91 m/z tropylium ion (typical in phenyl-containing compounds). As you are doing a splitless injection you would be pseudo-injecting any contaminants from the split-vent line onto the column during the splitless time. When the splitless time is done you now have a large flow going through the splitvent and into the trap. This is why you still get a peak with a decent shape vs just having a large baseline of m/z 91 with no peak definition.
My rule of thumb for HP/Agilent GCs when I have reproducibilty issues or ghost peaks is to make sure the entire injection system (including the split-vent) are completely clean.
I have a hard time believing that the peak is actually xylene/toluene as they would typically elute within the first 5 min on a 30m column. It is probably a high MW contaminant stuck in the split-vent with a phenyl group on it somewhere to be fragmented giving the 91 m/z tropylium ion (typical in phenyl-containing compounds). As you are doing a splitless injection you would be pseudo-injecting any contaminants from the split-vent line onto the column during the splitless time. When the splitless time is done you now have a large flow going through the splitvent and into the trap. This is why you still get a peak with a decent shape vs just having a large baseline of m/z 91 with no peak definition.
My rule of thumb for HP/Agilent GCs when I have reproducibilty issues or ghost peaks is to make sure the entire injection system (including the split-vent) are completely clean.
~Ty~
18 posts
Page 2 of 2
Who is online
In total there are 52 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 51 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 51 guests
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 51 guests
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
