Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 4:32 am
Hi Don_Hilton,
Thanks for your reply.
The results are getting worse day by day means that sometime even if I follow the same procedure, I dont get the peak. I dont reuse the Polypropylene vials.But I do keep my stock solution in PP vial and have been using it from the same vial for a couple of weeks.( I think PFOA wont react with the PP material).
The liner that we use is glasswool based on my understanding. But I can be wrong....have to check it with my labmates. I didnt know that inlet temperature has a big role. I will make sure that it is the same as in the paper. The carrier gas is Helium with a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min.
Also does manual injection has any advantage over the autosampling in terms of accuracy or reducing the contamination or anything?
I do feel that I missed out so much details in my previous posts which make it hard for many of you to diagnose the problems...Sorry about that!
juniorchem
Thanks for your reply.
The results are getting worse day by day means that sometime even if I follow the same procedure, I dont get the peak. I dont reuse the Polypropylene vials.But I do keep my stock solution in PP vial and have been using it from the same vial for a couple of weeks.( I think PFOA wont react with the PP material).
The liner that we use is glasswool based on my understanding. But I can be wrong....have to check it with my labmates. I didnt know that inlet temperature has a big role. I will make sure that it is the same as in the paper. The carrier gas is Helium with a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min.
Also does manual injection has any advantage over the autosampling in terms of accuracy or reducing the contamination or anything?
I do feel that I missed out so much details in my previous posts which make it hard for many of you to diagnose the problems...Sorry about that!
juniorchem