Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:17 pm
by HW Mueller
Are you sure that you didn´t just have an air bubble problem?
Especially when using fluorescence detection one should be familiar with the apparatus, one should know that it would be senseless to do a water Raman line test without water and without the cell. The Raman line test should have a very good S/N now, if the increase in signal is real. Also, the Raman line test should be performed frequently if you want to prevent unpleasant surprises.

Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:56 pm
by bisonium
HW Mueller, we at first thougt of the posibility to have a bubble trapped. But since the detector was washed with acetic acid, 1M NaOH, 20%EtOH and also flushed with lots and lots of MilliQ purified unionized water (for atleast 7 days in a row), the posible bubble problem should be eliminated?
The problem is that "no one" uses the W2475 detector, or atleast no one has experienced the 35 times signal loss. I hope the problem was something thas was trapped inside the detector. :)

Danko, almost every little part of the detector was exchanged, including the lamp (twice), the motherboard, the battery and the front panel board. I think that electrical connection cant be the problem since the signal (even if it was way too low) was very stable during the whole time of investigation.

I hope it-ll work fine now, at least the coming two weeks; I have quite a lot of analyses to perform with the mashine. :)

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:36 am
by HW Mueller
If you have an air leak somewhere in the system it doesn´t help to flush with zillions of solutions, you still get the air in.
Sometimes a necessary replumbing eliminates air leaks inadvertendly, maybe that´s what happened in your case?

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:52 am
by bisonium
Yeah, you are right there offcourse. Say, wouldn´t I have noticed some kind of Pressure stability fluctuations if having a leak?

/Mattias

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:20 pm
by HW Mueller
A constant leak after the pump wouldn´t be registered, you wouldn´t even see it as a lowering of flow (the leak would be very small if it went undetected). It is even imaginable that there was no leak but a insufficient degassing.

Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:44 pm
by bisonium
Thanks, I'll have that in mind as I troubleshoot further more. I got still one week to go, then vacation.