Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:17 pm
Are you sure that you didn´t just have an air bubble problem?
Especially when using fluorescence detection one should be familiar with the apparatus, one should know that it would be senseless to do a water Raman line test without water and without the cell. The Raman line test should have a very good S/N now, if the increase in signal is real. Also, the Raman line test should be performed frequently if you want to prevent unpleasant surprises.
Especially when using fluorescence detection one should be familiar with the apparatus, one should know that it would be senseless to do a water Raman line test without water and without the cell. The Raman line test should have a very good S/N now, if the increase in signal is real. Also, the Raman line test should be performed frequently if you want to prevent unpleasant surprises.