Advertisement

Electrospray Ionisation

Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.

2 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi,

I am trying to check the size of my histidine-tagged recombinant protein by mass spectrometry. My protein is 22.92kDa and I heard that eletrospray ionisation method is the right way to analyze it rather than MALDI-TOF (used for peptides mostly). Can anyone explain the reason behind this?

Thanks in advance..

Genepro

Hi,

I am not an expert in the field, but I would think that ESI is the better choice, since you get a cluster of different charge states of the same protein. Deconvolution permits determination of relatively accurate masses. The reason for the many charge states is that ESI is quite a gentle ionisation method.
MALDI on the other hand mostly leads to singly charged species. That is that you have to detect at round about 20kDa. However, the detection sensitivity decreases with increasing mass (unless you have got a high mass detector); this is since large ions don’t fly as well and thus do not hit the detector hard enough.
2 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 29 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 28 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry