Advertisement

Moxifloxin HCl (Anhydrous) API suitable GC

Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.

3 posts Page 1 of 1
Please suggest me Moxifloxin HCl (Anhydrous) API suitable residual solvents by GC analysis method.

My method parameters are

Column: HP-5, 30 m, 0.53 mm ID, 5 um.
Injecttor: Split (1:2), 100 c
Standard: Methanol, Methylene chloride, Acetic acid & Ethyl acetate.
Sample preparation: 50 mg/mL Benzyl alcohol
Liquied injection: 1 uL

My problum is Two major unknown peaks detected before methanol and so many peaks dected after methanol.
I also change different diluents and use HSS injection.
But unknown peaks are apper.
Hi

Well the starting point is:

A: To find out what solvents is used in the manufacturing process

B: Is it possible to use split injection or is headspace injection needed (your case indicate headspace)

C: Generally people is hesitant to reveal any detailed in house methods especially due that A tend to differs from manufacturer to manufacturer.

A good start is to consult USP chapter <467> and/or Ph Eur chapter 5.4 and 2.4.24 (USP & Ph Eur is quite harmonized) for general procedures and adapt to your specific situation and validate from there unless limit testing by pharmacopiea general procedures are good enough for you.

the above chapters are based on the ICH Q3C guideline.

In case you sell to the european market it is also adviseble to chech the EMEA site for specific requirements to rule out class 2 solvents from specification (ie set data requirements typically requiring X numbers of batches being below 10% of ICH Q3C limits provided class 2 solvent is NOT used in last synthesis step).
The same argument in EMEA region (ie likelyhood to be present in final drug substance) may work in other regions but not necessarly.
Izaak Kolthoff: “Theory guides, experiment decides.”
Hi
Sorry did miss that you edited your post. Your situation indicates many possible issues and choices of analytical strategy.

From an overall perspective: Acetic acid and ethylacetate is class 3 solvents and could be controlled via loss of drying (max 0,5%), which would leave you only with the class 2 solvent methylene chloride to worry about, so thats a possible control strategy unless you have a higher allowed loss of drying spec.

You still have no revealed if there are other potential solvents present. The unknow peaks can therefore have several sources. Nor have described if the same unknow peaks appears both in split and HS injection just that unknows appear, is it the same pattern?

Your substance in my experiance with regard to certain functional groups are often not particular stable, so unknowns ie degradation products can appear both in split injection and headspace (you did not state sample solvent used and headspace oven temp and time). I had a case where a drug substance was dissolved in water and unknowns appeared late in the chromatograms from HS injections, the developing chemist disreagarded those so when the final procedure came into use on a regular basis our headspace injectors became badly contaminated.

So you need to find out if the unknows are degradation products or actually volatile solvents or impurities. GC/MS is of course nice to have here. HS injection is generally more gentle so you could try setting HS oven to 35C°C for only 10mins for a spiked sample and then increasing HS oven temp in 10C°C steps to see how it changes.

Then we have some potential chemistry issues as well. Acetates like ethyl acetate are pH sensitive, your case indicates an acidic enviroment which could lead to acidic hydrolysis of both the drug and the acetate.(Ethyl acetate is synthesized industrially mainly via the classic Fischer esterification reaction of ethanol and acetic acid. This mixture converts to the ester in about 65% yield at room temperature).
So the case may be difficult hence I proposed using loss of drying for class 3 solvents.

Another option for headspace analysis is to dissolve lets say 0,2g of substance in DMF or suiteble sample solvent add 1-2ml pH 7 buffert and dilute to 10ml and analyse 1-4ml of this solution. However as acetic acid is/may be present it may not necesarly protect the ethyl acetate or the substance.

Finally acetic acid is difficult to analyse by GC, if you use the search funtion you will find some good threads on this topic. Sometimes one might get it to work othertime IC, titration (not this case it seems) or other approches such as loss of drying might be good enough/better.
Izaak Kolthoff: “Theory guides, experiment decides.”
3 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 50 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 50 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 5108 on Wed Nov 05, 2025 8:51 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry