Advertisement

spiking trace amount

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

6 posts Page 1 of 1
i heard about a technique where you can work below LOD:

-spike samples with various amounts of standards
-Plot the response vs. spiked amount
-work out the unknown from the intercept

what is the name of the technique? are people using this? any limitations? where can I found a reference?

thanks
mk

"Below LOD"...
where LOD means "Limit of Detection"

eg: You didn't see any.

The only way to lower LOD concentration is by injecting more sample (larger volume, more concentrated prep), maximizing detector sensitivity (minimize AUFS setting, this will add some to your noise, however), or changing to a more sensitive detector (going from UV to MSD, for example), or derivitizing samples with something that a detector is more sensitive to (amino acids treated w/ OPA(?), for example).

These all require at least some linearity testing, if not revalidating the method entirely.
Thanks,
DR
Image

MK, what you're describing sounds like "standard addition". It's useful primarily where no matrix blank is available. As DR indicated, however, it will not get you below the LOD.
-- Tom Jupille
LC Resources / Separation Science Associates
tjupille@lcresources.com
+ 1 (925) 297-5374
go to google, and search for standard additions method.

Top two hits look really good, third not so good, many others look promising.

Good luck.
Sailor

ok, I'll try to rephrase:

You have done all the tricks trying to improve sensitivity and you still don't see anything or you still have too low S/N. Can you use standard addition method to determine the concentration of the unknown?

If there is nothing and you spike the sample with different amounts of standard, your curve will pass around origin.

If there is something your intercept is not zero.

thanks
mk

That is an attempt to get something for nothing, and it does not work. While you gain from multiple measurements of the unknown, you lose it all from the uncertainties of the standards. LOD is by definition, the level below which the signal is indistinguishable from noise. Perhaps you mean the peak is detectable but not quantifiable?

Standard additions might work for peaks below LOQ but above LOD. However, it is easier and cheaper just to make multiple injections of the unknown and average the results.

Basically, there are almost no circumstances where standard additions is useful for HPLC-UV.
Mark Tracy
Senior Chemist
Dionex Corp.
6 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 12 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 10 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Amazon [Bot], Google [Bot] and 10 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry