by dries vrielink » Thu Sep 18, 2008 1:10 pm
Hello,
whenever you want to check the reproducibillity of your autosampler, it's always wise to use the same setup as stated by the manufacturer. Normally a typical reproducibillity is specified at certain conditions. So it's quit possible the autosampler reproducibillity can differ from the specifications when tested using a different test setup. Items to keep in mind are the following:
When using a restriction capillary, are you sure the backpressure of your system is high enough for the pulsedamper (inside your pump) to take effect? Otherwise, it could be quit possible, you are observing a small pulsating flow, which can affect the peak width and therefore the reproducibillity.
When using a column, make sure you use a compound with some retention and even better a typical optimum detection wavelength, so you're sure you are only measuring the peak of interest (without any underlying contaminations).
A typical basic setup we use a lot in our factory is:
Pumpflow @ 1.5mL/min, restriction capillary in between pump and autosampler of appr. 70 bars. (this takes care of any pulsation caused by a pulsedamper at low pressure)
Uracil dissolved in HPLC grade water as a testcompound, appr. 50 ppm
UV detection @ 254nm.
Eluens is HPLC grade water
Peakforming tubing (0.25mm PEEK, 10mtr) between autosampler and detector.
Outlet of the detector is appr. 10bars of restrictive tubing (to prevent any air bubbles from forming, but one should keep the maximum pressure resistance of the detector cell in mind offcourse).
Inject appr. 10uL using partial loopfill (this should be possible for loopsizes from 20uL and up)
After 10 injections, this should give you an accurate image of the reproducibillity of your autosampler.
But as stated before, first take a look at what Agilent subscribes as reproducibillity test and if possible use that.
Good luck with your experiments.