Advertisement

Problems with method in Discovery HS F5

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

4 posts Page 1 of 1
I´ve been trying to reproduce a previously reported separation method. The column is a Discovery HS F5 (supelco), and the samples are iron complexes of an aminated macrocycle, called desferrioxamine. They are polar, highly soluble in water.

Here is the fragment about the method:

"LC-MS analysis of tris-hydroxamates in culture supernatants... ...An Agilent 1100 HPLC instrument
equipped with a binary pump and a diode array detector was used
for HPLC analysis. Samples were analysed on a Supelco Discovery
HSF5 column (150x4.6 mm, 5 mm i.d., column temp. 20 uC) and
eluted with 10 mM ammonium carbonate, pH 7.0 (solvent A)/
MeOH (solvent B) (10 : 90) at 1 ml/min for 10 min, followed by a
gradient to 100 : 0 A/B over 8 min, 10 min isocratic conditions at
100 : 0 A/B, a gradient to 10 : 90 A/B over 8 min and isocratic conditions
at 10 : 90 A/B for 4 min. Ferric-tris-hydroxamate complexes
were detected by monitoring A(435nm)."

The problem is that I am getting no separation!!! I can´t reproduce the cromatograms reported in the article. Everything elutes in the front...

First, I thought it was the mobile phase, so I changed the very hygroscopic carbonate by a new one, carfully checking the pH. Then I evaluated the column under other conditions and analytes (from the catalog) and I was able to achieve a separation... so, the column works.
Then I tried a 1:1 dilution of the sample with the mobile phase... still nothing. Everything still elutes in the front.

I ran out of ideas... please, enlighten me!!!

Have you contacted Supelco Tech Service?

Try 800-359-3041

If that doesn't work, let me know.
hdz -
based on what you have written, the mobile phase appears to be backwards. It is rare that one would use these components in a HILIC (high organic modifier) system. I would, however, expect this system to work using the F5 in a reversed-phase mode. Can you provide the citation to the article you reference? You may also contact Supelco Tech Service via email at techservice@sial.com

thank you for your answers.
Well, in fact, I have already contacted Supelco. They suggested to equilibrate the column overnight, which I did, with a nice baseline noise reduction, but still no separation. They also are concerned about the sample solubility, but it works fine when I tried to run a 1:1 diluted sample in mobile phase.
Actually, I could not try a different gradient. I am not allowed, because the method was supposed to work that way as one of the authors (who is working with me, but is not the one who knows chromatography! :roll: ) claims.
The article reference is:
Microbiology (2006) 152 3355-3366
I am open to suggestions and I will try the reversed phase gradient... but I am still intrigued about this method and why it does not work with me
4 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 22 users online :: 2 registered, 0 hidden and 20 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 4374 on Fri Oct 03, 2025 12:41 am

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 20 guests

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry