-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:24 am
Advertisement
TQD perfomance
Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.
6 posts
Page 1 of 1
We plan to buy a waters TQD LC/MS/MS. Can anyone give a comment for the performance of this equipment?
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 1:57 am
We have 4 TQDs currently.We plan to buy a waters TQD LC/MS/MS. Can anyone give a comment for the performance of this equipment?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 1:24 am
We have 4 TQDs currently.We plan to buy a waters TQD LC/MS/MS. Can anyone give a comment for the performance of this equipment?
Could you provide some more detailed infos for the eqipment?
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 1:58 pm
Can I know what will be your application?
What made you to zero on TQD only? Are you not contacted any other vendor except waters?
Though Waters claims its very good system and I still need to see its real performance in the lab.
If you can explain me the reasons to choose TQD then probably I can give you a better advice.
What made you to zero on TQD only? Are you not contacted any other vendor except waters?
Though Waters claims its very good system and I still need to see its real performance in the lab.
If you can explain me the reasons to choose TQD then probably I can give you a better advice.
-
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:20 pm
Like DM, my company are also considering the Waters TQD for our bioanalytical quantitiation assays.
The pro's for us are:
1. Compatibility with our validated (CFR 21 pt 11 compiant) Empower 2 system.
2. No additional software to validate/learn.
3. No further SOPs required (just additions to existing ones).
4. Timeline for Qualification for GLP use is optimized.
Consequently, I would be interested in views of users. My lab deals with pre-clinical (toxicokinetic and Pharmacokinetic samples in multiple species rather than human clinical samples.
The pro's for us are:
1. Compatibility with our validated (CFR 21 pt 11 compiant) Empower 2 system.
2. No additional software to validate/learn.
3. No further SOPs required (just additions to existing ones).
4. Timeline for Qualification for GLP use is optimized.
Consequently, I would be interested in views of users. My lab deals with pre-clinical (toxicokinetic and Pharmacokinetic samples in multiple species rather than human clinical samples.
Good judgment comes from bad experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
-
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:59 pm
comment: There will be a little bit of a learning curve if this is your first MSD - just because MSDs are not at all like UVs or PDAs.
related question: [hijack] Does the MSD (for Acquity) require its own PC or do you just plug it into a LAC/E along with the rest of the system (Empower 2, via Citrix).[/hijack]
related question: [hijack] Does the MSD (for Acquity) require its own PC or do you just plug it into a LAC/E along with the rest of the system (Empower 2, via Citrix).[/hijack]
Thanks,
DR

DR

6 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 11462 on Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:32 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Most users ever online was 11462 on Mon Dec 08, 2025 9:32 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science
