by
pi3832 » Wed Sep 13, 2006 8:26 pm
MikeD and mbulentcakar:
Thanks for the excellent links. I've downloaded the PDFs and am starting to go through them. Interesting how the European stuff seems so much more clear than the U.S. stuff.
BTW, I did find what appears to be a useful NIST website:
e-Handbook of Statistical Methods
Unfortunately, I've been finding that site a little hard to comprehend. At times it seems that some people make statistics more confusing than it needs to be.
(Anecdote:
A lab where I worked many years ago had this odd, intricate calculation that I was required to do on certain samples. For a while I just sighed and did it.
But then I started to dig into the procedure and ask where the calculation came from, and discovered that it was mostly bogus. Talking to others I eventually figured out that the guy who had written the procedure didn't know anything about statistics, so he had just taken some basic equations and algebraically manipulated them until they were unrecognizable and suitably complicated to look impressive.
I worked them backwards to their original form, then simplified them based on the limited application for which we were using them, and came up with a one-step calculation you could do on a calculator, instead of the previous one that had required a computer spreadsheet.
I've been dubious of complex statistical calculations ever since.)