Page 1 of 1

shifting retention time of acetone

Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2019 6:09 pm
by shastasheen
Hi, I am currently on a method development of GFC and I am very new on this technique. I use polystyrene sulfonate as standards and acetone as a maker of the exclusion volume of the column. However, the retention time of acetone seems different under different mobile phase. At a flow rate of 1ml/min, the retention time of acetone is 12.5 min in 100% water, 11.9min in 75% 10mM/20mM phosphate buffer + 25%ACN, 11.5min in 65%10mM/20mM phosphate buffer + 35%ACN, 13.8min in 80% (50mM phosphate buffer + 0.1M NaCl) + 20% MeOH. This is confusing me since there should be no secondary interactions between acetone and the column matrix, theoretically, the retention time should be the same, unless there are some fundamental that I missed since I never use SEC before.

Every time before changing the buffer, I flushed the column thoroughly with water and 30%ACN, it shouldn't be the retention problem (the retention times are very reproducible under each mobile phase). I also noticed that even the calibration curve made with polystyrene sulfonate are not linear at the low Mw, the slope became less steep, which also confuse me.

I wonder if acetone is a good marker for the exclusion volume, and how can I determine the exclusion volume at its optimal condition (all the secondary interactions are suppressed to the minimum)? More importantly, can anyone tell me why the calibration curve became less steep at the lower Mw?

Many thanks in advance!

Re: shifting retention time of acetone

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:35 pm
by Multidimensional
This is something that is indeed fundamental to liquid chromatography. The packing support material will swell and change shape depending on what it is soaked in (the mobile phase). Those changes affect the available internal and external surface area inside the column (the packed TUBE or Cylinder). This is why changes in column void volume can be measured and why we both estimate AND measure it using the specific method conditions that we plan on using. So column void volume (and exclusion times in your case) will be constant for the same mobile phase.

Re: shifting retention time of acetone

Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:42 pm
by Multidimensional
PS: I should have also mentioned that to get a quick check of where the the theoretical exclusion volume (time) is for your method, watch for the injector's pressure pulse (blip) on the baseline. This hardware artifact is a reliable indicator of where the void volume is and is not subject to absorption effects.