-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:51 am
which SEC column is more hydrophobic
Discussions about gel permeation chromatography / gel filtration chromatography / size exclusion chromatography
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
diol-modified silica based SEC or sephdex column?
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:02 pm
Sephadex is not hydrophobic - it is a dextran polymer bead (glucose polymer). There are some treated sephadexes - lipophilic sephadex as an example. That said, I don't think it can take the pressure of an HPLC - it is more of a low pressure to medium pressure support (100 psi max).
-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:08 pm
- Location: Denmark
Actually it is the other way around – it does not exhibit too strong flow resistance, hence the pressure doesn’t get too high.
You can apply several mL/min flow (all depending on the column dimensions of course) without even getting close to the pressure limit.
So, it is the flow rate that is important and not the pressure.
Best Regards
You can apply several mL/min flow (all depending on the column dimensions of course) without even getting close to the pressure limit.
So, it is the flow rate that is important and not the pressure.
Best Regards
Learn Innovate and Share
Dancho Dikov
Dancho Dikov
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:02 pm
danko wrote:
Actually it is the other way around – it does not exhibit too strong flow resistance, hence the pressure doesn’t get too high.
You can apply several mL/min flow (all depending on the column dimensions of course) without even getting close to the pressure limit.
So, it is the flow rate that is important and not the pressure.
Best Regards
I do agree with you up to a point. Depends on particle size - I am a protein chemist so I have worked with sephedex for a long time (at least 15 yrs.). It is pressure limited because of compressibility (like polystryrene columns) and therefore can have issues.
-
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 2:08 pm
- Location: Denmark
It is pressure limited and so are all other materials. Sephadex is more susceptible to high pressures than silica based materials for instance. But my point was as follows:
High pressure per se is not a particularly desirable goal. If you can apply the desired flow rate in order to achieve a certain separation, efficiency or whatever, then the pressure is of no concern, as long as it is within the material’s limits. Reworded, the pressure is a consequence and not a goal.
Best Regards
High pressure per se is not a particularly desirable goal. If you can apply the desired flow rate in order to achieve a certain separation, efficiency or whatever, then the pressure is of no concern, as long as it is within the material’s limits. Reworded, the pressure is a consequence and not a goal.
Best Regards
Learn Innovate and Share
Dancho Dikov
Dancho Dikov
5 posts
Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1117 on Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:50 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Most users ever online was 1117 on Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:50 pm
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science
Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.
Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.
- Follow us on Twitter: @Sep_Science
- Follow us on Linkedin: Separation Science