interpreting odd low resolution(?) smushed(?) ESI-MS peaks

Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.

3 posts Page 1 of 1
I'm looking at four hexapeptides. Crystallized monomers are in a dH20 solution (where they self aggregate) and are analyzed using ESI-MS (Finnigan LTQ, Thermo-Scientific). I first look at the full mass spectrum and then to look at each oligomer I use a function of the LTQ software called ultrazoom which is basically a high resolution scan of a small specified range.

The lower oligomers display very distinct peaks, but at the higher oligomers every other m/z complex seems to display this very odd round hill type shape

Image

I don't quite understand what is happening. The only thing I can think of is that there are mobile protons so each peak is less distinct.

I don't even know how to search for this phenomenon in the literature as I don't know what it's called

Would really appreciate some help pointing me in the right direction
what you are seeing are multiply charged peaks, not the high- and low- oligomers. You can definitely deduce it because the difference between the peaks is less than 1 AMU. On the high mass peaks, the individual charge states are still resolved, giving the "spiky" appearance, while at the low end (highly charged peptides) the difference in m/z between the charge states is so small that it cant' be resolved by tour instruments.

A quick look hints to me that the top figure represents a charge state of +3. That means the peaks you are seeing are the isotope pattern of [M + 3H]3+ , which correspond to a peptide of 5455 Da. The figure at the bottom is harder to interpret. According to the mass, it could be the +4 peak (that means [M+4H]4+) of the same peptide. However, given the resolution shown in the picture above, I would expect to see the individual isotopic peaks resolved (you would need to fit 4 in the same space where you fit 3 , they would not be baseline resolved but still distinguishable). This makes me think that the bottom picture is a higher charged state of a heavier peptide


primer on topic

https://masspec.scripps.edu/publication ... 78_art.pdf
carlo.annaratone wrote:
what you are seeing are multiply charged peaks, not the high- and low- oligomers. You can definitely deduce it because the difference between the peaks is less than 1 AMU. On the high mass peaks, the individual charge states are still resolved, giving the "spiky" appearance, while at the low end (highly charged peptides) the difference in m/z between the charge states is so small that it cant' be resolved by tour instruments.

A quick look hints to me that the top figure represents a charge state of +3. That means the peaks you are seeing are the isotope pattern of [M + 3H]3+ , which correspond to a peptide of 5455 Da. The figure at the bottom is harder to interpret. According to the mass, it could be the +4 peak (that means [M+4H]4+) of the same peptide. However, given the resolution shown in the picture above, I would expect to see the individual isotopic peaks resolved (you would need to fit 4 in the same space where you fit 3 , they would not be baseline resolved but still distinguishable). This makes me think that the bottom picture is a higher charged state of a heavier peptide


primer on topic

https://masspec.scripps.edu/publication ... 78_art.pdf


Thank you so much for your reply. My apologies for not explaining fully the first time, but the top figure is a heptapeptide with a charge state of three and the bottom figure is the same heptapeptide with a charge state of four.

The ultrazoom scan is basically a very high resolution scan of a specified m/z range, so it seems very odd that some m/z complexes have this very low resolution (bottom figure) result where the peaks are not distinct, whereas some m/z complexes don't.

Image

Is it possible that multiple higher charged states of heavier peptides are coexisting with the lower charged lighter peptides ie the 7/4, 14/8, 21/12 complexes exist in similar intensities and therefore the differences between the charged states are small that they can't be resolved by our instruments? Is there a way to test this hypothesis?
3 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1117 on Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry