By Hu Yulan on Thursday, May 20, 2004 - 09:28 pm:

It seems SIR is more sensitive than MRM from my experience. Anyone can tell me the reason?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Anonymous on Sunday, May 23, 2004 - 10:54 am:

In general, MRM should be more sensitive than SIR primarly due to the significant reduction in noise (sensitivity is signal/noise). However, it is entirly possible to set up a poor MRM experiment and have a lower S/N than a well set up SIR experiment.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Hu Yulan on Sunday, May 23, 2004 - 09:42 pm:

Thank you very much for your reply. I am still quite confusing about such terms as SIR, SRM,SIM. Anyone can tell me how to distinguish them?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Anonymous on Monday, May 24, 2004 - 06:11 am:

Hmm, I'm also interested in these terms. I know what an SIR and a TIC are , but thats all :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Hu Yulan on Wednesday, May 26, 2004 - 08:52 pm:

SIR; single ion recording
SRM: single reaction monitoring
SIM: single ion monitoring

So is SIR the same as SIM?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Anonymous on Thursday, May 27, 2004 - 04:16 am:

In fact SIM = Selected Ion Monitoring. I would say that SIR is just not a correct way to describe the experiment you are suggesting.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By MG on Tuesday, June 1, 2004 - 06:41 am:

If you don't observe any particularly strong fragments at any collision energy, or if your fragments are very low in mass and therefore noisy, then it is possible that the SIM experiment would be more sensitive.