Troubleshooting - Your thoughts welcome!

Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.

4 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi,

I am heavily reliant on a GC-MS for my research work and for that reason, I tend to try to be reasonably conservative/careful in order to minimise downtime which (as a heavy user) hits me hard. I normally develop basic methods on FID and then move to GC-MS, keeping my sample concentrations for splitless at or below 50 PPM where I can. A colleague who is supposedly 'very experienced' at GC recently decided to run a bunch of quite viscous samples through our GC-MS at 'PPM concentrations' with no solvent delay after assuring our technicians that it would be fine.

As it turned out the dilutions were way off (they turned out to be at parts per hundred level!) and this led to quite a bit of downtime due to the filaments burning out, the technicians having to spend a lot of time cleaning the source etc. and various other issues.

It's now back up and sort of running, but sensitivity is way, way down. After running an inlet leak detection/restriction test, it would appear that there is a whopping 50ml/min leak in the injector.

My interpretation of this result (which is repeatable) is that the split valve is not closing properly, possibly down to being clagged up with the viscous sample referred to earlier in this post, leading to my splitless runs not being splitless at all. The other thing that I think might support this idea, is that the liner seems remarkably easy to remove and put back in - it normally needs a bit time to work its way down and requires a little bit of force, presumably as any gas in the inlet which is being displaced would normally have to works its way around and through the new liner.

Does this interpretation sound right, or is there perhaps something else that I haven't considered?

Many thanks for any thoughts on this.

TD2
Looks like your assumptions gone right way.

Maybe for testing:
1. Create splitless method
2. Physically seal the split line (with a stub) before valve.
3. Inject 0.2 - 0.5 mkl

The response should be significantly bigger than one with normal 1:5 split
What type of GC-MS are you using?

How did you determine that the leak is at the inlet?
Many thanks or the responses and apologies for not getting back...

The problem now appears to be resolved. Whilst I would love to be able to provide something of value for the community, I'm afraid that I can't. The engineer (who I missed) obviously realized that the issue was injector related and just changed out the entire injector for a new one. Great result but sadly not much to be learned!
4 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1117 on Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry