Method for detection of cannabinoids for gc fid

Discussions about GC and other "gas phase" separation techniques.

6 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi all
Tell you that I am in a dilemma, since I work with forensic toxicology and urgently need a method for detecting cannabinoids and cannabinoid metabolites in various samples. my team is Agilent 7890B GC and my column is HP5-MS UI 30 meters and 0.25 mm in diameter; greatly appreciate it if someone could colaborarme passing me a paper, a method or a link where I can find him. Thank you so much. And sorry if my English is not good and I am from Bolivia and speak Spanish. THANKS. :D :D
I believe the compound you will be looking for is 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Generally the detector used is mass spec, as the ramifications of a false positive can be very serious; unlike the FID, the MS detector is orthogonal: retention time coupled with mass fragments is characteristic of the compound of interest. (Mass fragments alone should be sufficient.)

With that in mind, there are several papers on the subject that can be found via Google Scholar. Some examples:

http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/6/441.short

http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/5/289.short

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ci ... 3b4511.pdf

If you can get this (rather old) paper, it specifically addresses GC-FID:

http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/1/49.short

But the caveat stands: anything less than mass spec is not a responsible way to go about it in a legal setting.
Phthalates come out at the same retention time as THC, and as osp001 said, GCMS is the only alternative.

Phthalates have different Ions than THC, so a SIM method using only THC ions produces excellent library matches.

That is how I got around the Phthalate problem from utensils.
osp001 wrote:
I believe the compound you will be is 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Generally the detector used is mass spec, as the ramifications of a false positive can be very serious; unlike the FID, the MS detector is orthogonal: retention time coupled with mass fragments is characteristic of the compound of interest. (Mass fragments alone should be sufficient.)

With that in mind, there are several papers on the subject that can be found via Google Scholar. Some examples:

http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/6/441.short

http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/25/5/289.short

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ci ... 3b4511.pdf

If you can get this (rather old) paper, it specifically addresses GC-FID:

http://jat.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/1/49.short

But the caveat stands: anything less than mass spec is not a responsible way to go about it in a legal setting.


Thank you very much :mrgreen:
I work in forensic toxicology myself. The only way for reliable and reportable results is with Mass Spec and even then the results can be variable batch to batch.

From blood the THC needs to be extracted using solid phase extraction.

We have recently had development using LC-MS/MS but only for qualitative purposes.
Thank you. The articles are very informative and good written. I was looking for this information, and it helped me a lot.
6 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there are 11 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 10 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 234 on Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:33 am

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests