Agilent XDB-C18 for determining vitamin C

Discussions about HPLC, CE, TLC, SFC, and other "liquid phase" separation techniques.

7 posts Page 1 of 1
Hi

My laboratory provides me with Agilent XDB-C18 column. Is it suitable to determine vitamin C in fruits (apple, orange)? What are pros and cons of this column in this case?
To get some retention for ascorbic acid on C18 columns, there are basically 2 approaches:

(1) Acidic (pH < 2), 100% aqueous mobile phase
(2) Make use of ion-pair agents

If you go for (1), this particular column might not be the best as it has an optimal pH range of 3-8. The second approach should work as the mobile phase is closer to neutral. You can find plenty of methods for ascorbic acid online. I believe (2) is the most common approach for ascorbic acid using reversed-phase.
Bessie wrote:
Hi

My laboratory provides me with Agilent XDB-C18 column. Is it suitable to determine vitamin C in fruits (apple, orange)? What are pros and cons of this column in this case?


Also note for the future - one cannot make every assay fit a certain column or columns, your management must supply you with right tools to do the job.

A saw doesn't help much when a screwdriver is the right tool....
If you need good retention control and peak shape along with mass spec compatibility you can try one of our approaches (two HILIC and one RP/anion-exchange).
https://helixchrom.com/compounds/ascorbic-acid/

You can spend tons of time with a wrong column and then end up buying a different one.

Let me know if you have questions.
Vlad Orlovsky
HELIX Chromatography
My opinions might be bias, but I have about 1000 examples to support them. Check our website for new science and applications
www.helixchrom.com
Any (almost) C18 column can analyze Ascorbic Acid (I did with a 10 um Spherisorb back in the dark ages) but you have to remember to use ~10% meta-phoshoric acid (not ortho!) in your extraction media and mobile phase. It will prevent the formation of the anhydro analog of Ascorbic Acid.
it's the extraction, not the chromatography, that's difficult. Extracting ascorbate without loss is very hard, and the common literature methods are actually rubbish, but no one dares admit it, because they've been around so long (sorry, feeling grumpy about this one).
lmh wrote:
it's the extraction, not the chromatography, that's difficult. Extracting ascorbate without loss is very hard, and the common literature methods are actually rubbish, but no one dares admit it, because they've been around so long (sorry, feeling grumpy about this one).


I can agree with that. I tried once for a combined method for Vitamin Bs and Vitamin C because it was listed in the example chromatograms that way, never did make it work. The Bs were stable and sensitive but the C recovery in standards was all over the charts.
The past is there to guide us into the future, not to dwell in.
7 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1117 on Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry