I've got a bad feeling about this !
The GC and GC-MS suppliers have been focussing more and more on operator - resistant instruments optimised for routine analyses using standard methods. Fair enough, this is where the big sales are. The leader in this trend has been Agilent - their instruments are great as long as you want to have them used by technicians doing routine analyses, but as soon as you want to develop some new hardware - say a different way of doing purge and trap, or an in-house 2D GC setup - their in-built monitoring which in a routine lab ensures that nobody can generate a result when the machine is not working right, shuts them down. You can buy add-ons from Agilent and their partners but they are very costly, and they do not cover everything. All of this makes perfect business sense of course, so from that point of view congratulations are in order. Varians have been easier to modify for special purposes, although each new model has been a bit more operator resistant than the last.
This merger / acquisition will result in less choice in the lab - I cannot see that it will make any kind of sense for Agilent to continue to market Varian GCs or GC-MSs, and how good is the after sales support on Varian's likely to be now ?
What about local support away from the big markets ? are Agilent going to keep the best people from both Agilent and Varian local suppliers, or just stick with the historical Agilent suppliers ?
There is a saying " When elephants fight the grass gets trampled".
Peter