Separation of d8 and d9 THC

Discussions about GC-MS, LC-MS, LC-FTIR, and other "coupled" analytical techniques.

6 posts Page 1 of 1
Hello,

We are using a Restek Rxi®-35Sil on a Thermo Trace GC/FID System to analyse cannabinoids. The separation is working well, except that we get peak overlap between delta 8 and delta 9 THC, which are very similar molecules. The method we use is precisely as recommended by Restek for this column (see attachment), yet we do not achieve the separation of the these molecules. I tried to optimize the method (slower Temperature increase, decrease flow rate) a bit to improve the separation, but nothing worked. Do you have an idea how to tweak the system to improve this separation? Are we overlooking something?

Thanks a lot for any input!

Image
Do you also use hydrogen gas as carrier like in the application note?

Can you post a chromatogram that you obtained?
Yes, we use hydrogen carrier. Please find two chromatograms attached, on the first one you can see the large CBD peak, and you can already see the THC overlap on the right. The second one shows the THC overlap zoomed in. (sorry for the low image quality, taken by phone)

Image
Image
What solvent are you using and what is your temperature program?
The past is there to guide us into the future, not to dwell in.
Reducing the carrier flow rate as you have done usually makes separations worse - the peaks are further apart in time but they are also wider, so they overlap more.

Your CBD peak is overloaded - what happens if you double the split ratio ?

How much work has this column done, and when did you last do inlet maintenance ?

Peter
Peter Apps
Peter Apps wrote:
Reducing the carrier flow rate as you have done usually makes separations worse - the peaks are further apart in time but they are also wider, so they overlap more.

Your CBD peak is overloaded - what happens if you double the split ratio ?

How much work has this column done, and when did you last do inlet maintenance ?

Peter


Agreed, faster flow will give narrower peaks especially if using H2 carrier. Also if injecting Ethyacetate as the solvent, use a mid polarity deactivated retention gap of about 1-5m and solvent focusing starting with oven at 50c then ramping as fast as possible to 90c with a 1 minute hold before continuing the ramp will give sharper peaks. Retention gap polarity need to match polarity of the injected solvent or you will not get sharp peaks. I had to do this when injecting Ethylacetate onto a Rtx-5 column to sharpen peaks for these analytes.
The past is there to guide us into the future, not to dwell in.
6 posts Page 1 of 1

Who is online

In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 1117 on Mon Jan 31, 2022 2:50 pm

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Latest Blog Posts from Separation Science

Separation Science offers free learning from the experts covering methods, applications, webinars, eSeminars, videos, tutorials for users of liquid chromatography, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, sample preparation and related analytical techniques.

Subscribe to our eNewsletter with daily, weekly or monthly updates: Food & Beverage, Environmental, (Bio)Pharmaceutical, Bioclinical, Liquid Chromatography, Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry.

Liquid Chromatography

Gas Chromatography

Mass Spectrometry